<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Ben Poole</title>
<link>http://benpoole.com</link>
<language>en-gb</language>
<description>Ben Poole: last 10 &#8217;blog entries filed under &#8220;Technology&#8221;</description>
<copyright>Copyright 1997 - 2012, Benedict Poole</copyright>
<generator>Domino SimpleFeed from http://foo-soft.com</generator>
<webMaster>site@benpoole.com (Ben Poole)</webMaster>
<atom:link href="http://benpoole.com/bp.nsf/blogs-cat.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item><title>Codeyear and site design</title><pubDate>Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:30 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>After checking out the <a href="http://codeyear.com">Code Year</a> site recently launched by <a href="http://www.codecademy.com">Codecademy</a>, I moved on to read an interesting post from that site&#8217;s designer, Sacha Greif: <a href="http://sachagreif.com/how-i-designed-codeyear-com-in-1-hour/">How I Designed CodeYear.com in 1 Hour</a>. Definitely check this post out: Sacha deftly guides the reader through the over-arching thought processes behind an effective site re-design. There are some handy tips and links along the way for any budding designers, or coders like you and I who simply want to to create more pleasant web experiences.</p>

<p>As for Code Year, what a great initiative!</p>

<blockquote cite="http://www.rushkoff.com/blog/2010/3/25/program-or-be-programmed.html">If you are not a programmer, you are one of the programmed. It&#8217;s that simple.</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.rushkoff.com/blog/2010/3/25/program-or-be-programmed.html" title="Link to Douglas Rushkoff, &#8220;Program or Be Programmed&#8221;">Douglas Rushkoff</a> says it best.</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201201042230</link><dc:subject>codeyear, douglas rushkoff, programming, codecademy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201201042230</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201201042230#comments</comments></item><item><title>Netgear ReadyNAS &amp; OS X: fixing printing</title><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:40 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>I&#8217;ve used my trusty <a href="http://www.readynas.com/?cat=4">Netgear ReadyNAS</a> for several years now, it&#8217;s super. When OS X Lion came out, Apple twiddled with <abbr title="Apple Filing Protocol">AFP</abbr> in the network stack, which meant that using many <abbr title="Network Attached Storage">NAS</abbr> implementations (Netgear&#8217;s included) as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Machine_(Mac_OS)" title="Link to Wikipedia page on Apple&#8217;s Time Machine utility">Time Machine</a> targets no longer worked.</p>

<p>To their credit, Netgear had beta firmware releases out in no time, which addressed this issue. However, one side effect seemed to be that for those of us who also use the ReadyNAS as a print server (it&#8217;s a Linux box basically, so you get <a href="http://www.cups.org/">CUPS</a> for free), printing was b0rked. Bonjour detection of the printer was still OK, one could send print jobs to it, but something went awry along the way and OS X reported <samp>Unable to get printer status</samp>. Hmm.</p>

<p>A very helpful chap by the name of <a href="http://www.christianfries.com">Dr. Christian Fries</a> posted some steps on the official ReadyNAS forums to address this printing issue. I can report that whilst this tip did not work for me with the beta firmware releases, bizarrely it does now that the firmware is production-ready (I&#8217;m using the newly-released 4.1.8 for my SPARC-based NV+).</p>

<p>Here I reproduce Dr. Fries&#8217; tip with some notes of my own, and I&#8217;ve also added a screenshot of the end result in CUPS (this is all assuming you&#8217;re on OS X <abbr title="By The Way">BTW</abbr>!)</p>

<ol>
<li>Set up the printer as you would normally (it should just appear when you add a printer in system preferences (assuming you advertise ReadyNAS print queues over Bonjour). My device is a Canon PIXMA iP4500. It comes with reasonable drivers, but they won&#8217;t work if you use the printer on the network via a NAS. Instead, once you&#8217;ve opted to add your printer, choose the drop-down option to &#8220;Select Printer Software&hellip;&#8221; thus: <img class="feature-image" src="http://benpoole.com/bp.nsf/files/201109121240/$file/gutenprint.png" width="738" height="554" alt="Adding my PIXMA iP4500 printer in OS X, using the Gutenburg drivers" style="display: block; margin: 1em 0 1em 0" />&hellip; and then select the relevant Gutenberg driver for your printer (they cover pretty much everything out there). You should have Gutenberg drivers installed already, but you can always grab the latest versions at the <a href="http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/">Gutenberg site</a>.</li>
<li>Open <a href="http://127.0.0.1:631">http://127.0.0.1:631</a> in your web browser. This is the CUPS page, the printing subsystem of OS X (you may need to alter the IP address or host, depending on your set-up).</li>
<li>Select &#8220;Administration&#8221; and then &#8220;Manage Printers&#8221;. Select the non-functioning ReadyNAS print queue.</li>
<li>Now choose &#8220;Modify Printer&#8221; from the &#8220;Administration&#8221; drop-down that appears below the print queue name.</li>
<li>On the resulting screen, look for the heading &#8220;Other Network Printers&#8221; and click the &#8220;Windows printer via spoolss&#8221; radio button. Click &#8220;Continue&#8221; and you should then see a screen requesting a connection string&hellip;</li>
<li>&hellip; this connection string should be in this format: <samp>smb://YOUR_NAS/YOUR_QUEUE</samp>, where <samp>YOUR_NAS</samp> is either the host name or private IP address of your ReadyNAS as it appears in the Finder (e.g. <samp>readynas.local</samp> or <samp>192.168.1.1</samp>) and <samp>YOUR_QUEUE</samp> is the name of your printer as it appears in the ReadyNAS FrontView screen (note that you don&#8217;t need to include port numbers or extra bits like <samp>IPP</samp> as you might expect; just use the path as expressed here).</li>
<li>Done!</li>
</ol>

<p>OK, so this is how my printer looks in CUPS (where <samp>iP4500_serie</samp> is the name of the queue in FrontView):</p>

<p><img class="feature-image" src="http://benpoole.com/bp.nsf/files/201109121240/$file/printer.png" width="968" height="289" alt="My CUPS screen showing ReadyNAS print queue" /></p>

<p>Read the original post - <a href="http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=55225&amp;p=320842#p319716">ReadyNAS forums: Re: Problems printing with 4.1.18</a></p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109121240</link><dc:subject>readynas, cups, os x, netgear, tips</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109121240</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109121240#comments</comments></item><item><title>Configuring multiple email addresses in iOS</title><pubDate>Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:51 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>It’s (probably) a little-known secret that you can specify multiple “Sender” email addresses in the default OS X mail application. Once more than one address is specified in preferences, the “From” field in any mail composed becomes a drop-down from which you can choose the required address:</p><p><img class="feature-image" src="http://benpoole.com/bp.nsf/files/201109022151/$file/omg_bruce.png" height="485" width="535" alt="Bruce won’t know what hit him" /></p><p>This is pretty handy if, like me, you use multiple addresses. OK, so here’s how to set that up in Mail.app’s preferences: go to the “Account Information” tab in the “Accounts” pane, and edit the “Email Address” field thus:</p><p><img class="feature-image" src="http://benpoole.com/bp.nsf/files/201109022151/$file/email_setup.png" alt="Specifying multiple email addresses in OS X Mail.app (screenshot)" height="85" width="532" /></p><p>Just separate the addresses you want to use with commas: easy! Now, where things become a little trickier is in the realm of iOS. The lack of apparent multiple email address support in the iOS mail client was a bit of a bug-bear to me last week especially, whilst on holiday. Yes, you can set up multiple email accounts, one for each address you want to use, but that’s nasty—especially when it comes to downloading your mail (multiple copies ahoy).</p><p>In a moment of quiet contemplation I figured that perhaps the comma trick would work in iOS too, but you hit an apparent <i>impasse</i> as the mail client set-up precludes the use of commas in the “Address” field. Hmm. Ah, but a bit of lateral thinking suggests that if perhaps one has a comma secreted about one’s person (OK, in one’s clipboard), the lack of comma in the relevant on-screen keyboard becomes moot. Aha!</p><p>Well what do you know, it worked. When checking this wee tip out I found an excellent post which summarises what is required, step-by-step, with screenshots to boot. Take a gander:</p><p><a href="http://modernerd.com/post/535350679/solved-gmail-ipad-iphone-and-multiple-from">Nick Cernis: Solved: Gmail, iPad, iPhone, and multiple from addresses</a> (the link is Google-specific, but I see no reason why the tips contained therein can’t work for your provider of choice).</p><p>Splendid.</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109022151</link><dc:subject>ios, email, mail.app, os x, mail, tips</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109022151</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201109022151#comments</comments></item><item><title>Reeder</title><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:47 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>I&#8217;ve been using OS X since its inception, way back in 2001. And since I&#8217;ve been using OS X, I&#8217;ve also been using <a href="http://netnewswireapp.com/">NetNewsWire</a>, the wonderful news reader originally developed by <a href="http://inessential.com/">Brent Simmons</a>. There was a sea-change this summer though, oh yes! Tired of the latest version of NNW (and its beach-balling), I opted to switch.</p><p>You see, I tried NNW on the iPhone (it was OK but didn&#8217;t really &#8220;stick&#8221; for me). I &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to NNW 4 (the app store-friendly iteration) but that has some annoying deficiencies and shows no sign of ever being updated, and I was somewhat frustrated with my news feeds as a result.</p><p>But I&#8217;d heard good things about <a href="http://reederapp.com/">Reeder</a>, and after a straw poll on twitter, decided to get it. Well, it sure is purty, so having made the purchase I fired it up and imported my news feeds. Splendid! I used it happily for a couple of weeks, and then opted to grab the iOS version too. Even better! It&#8217;s good to be keeping up with news again now. First of all, Reeder chucks content to whatever service you care to mention (I use <a href="http://delicious.com">delicious</a> and <a href="http://instapaper.com">Instapaper</a> mainly, but the <a href="http://www.evernote.com/">Evernote</a> integration is cool too), and what&#8217;s more, the iOS / Mac OS versions sync nicely via <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/">Google Reader</a>.</p><p>Recommended.</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201108271647</link><dc:subject>reeder, netnewsire, rss, atom, news feeds, apps</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201108271647</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201108271647#comments</comments></item><item><title>The old “native vs. web” chestnut</title><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:24:38 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>What ho! Just over a week ago I picked up on this opinion piece from Hutch Carpenter, in which there is much discussion about mobile apps&#8212;specifically why enterprises should look at the <strong>mobile web</strong> route, rather than native applications. Carpenter makes a number of points supporting his case, and I can&#8217;t say I disagree. <em>Of course</em> there are scenarios when a native app is the only way to go, but for a lot of this stuff the web is spot-on (and the web can still have a part to play in native apps&#8212;think cross-compilers such as those in <a href="http://www.appcelerator.com">Appcelerator</a> and <a href="http://phonegap.com">PhoneGap</a>). Anyway, here is one of Carpenter&#8217;s clinchers:</p>

<blockquote cite="http://bhc3.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/four-reasons-enterprise-software-should-skip-native-mobile-apps/">Indeed, designing for a mobile experience is actually a great exercise for enterprise software vendors. It puts the focus on simplicity and the most commonly used functions. It&#8217;s also a chance to re-imagine the <abbr title="User eXperience">UX</abbr> of the software. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if elements the mobile optimized HTML <i>[a strange sentence, but I&#8217;m sure you get his point - BP]</i> find their way back to the main web experience.</blockquote>

<p>Hutch Carpenter: <a href="http://bhc3.wordpress.com/2011/06/06/four-reasons-enterprise-software-should-skip-native-mobile-apps/">Four reasons enterprise software should skip native mobile apps</a>.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s a parallel here; look at where Apple are going with iOS, OSX (and the respective app stores) with noticeable feature and paradigm exchanges between the Mac and its iBrethren. The interplay between iOS and OSX has come to the point that the forthcoming release of the Mac&#8217;s operating system (&#8220;Lion&#8221;) will include a number of innovations originally seen in iOS. It&#8217;s clear that this is happening in the mobile space too. Constraints in screen real estate, functionality and memory have all led to some real innovation. The provision of decent mobile browsers (mainly courtesy of WebKit) now means that we have some amazing frameworks for all major devices. And what technologies do some of these frameworks base themselves on? Why, good old HTML and Javascript! Look at the aforementioned Appcelerator and PhoneGap, or the web frameworks <a href="http://jquerymobile.com">jQuery Mobile</a> and <a href="http://www.sencha.com">Sencha</a> if you don&#8217;t believe me (heck, look at the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p92QfWOw88I" title="Link to Microsoft video, &#8220;Building 'Windows 8' - Video #1&#8221;">demonstration of Windows 8</a> that&#8217;s out there).</p>

<p>So developers, if you&#8217;re looking for some new stuff to learn, by all means roll with Ruby, partake of some Python, simper with Scala&hellip; but don&#8217;t neglect trusty mark-up and its pal Javascript&#8212;in case it&#8217;s not become clear yet, you will need your web skills more and more.</p>

<p class="footnote"><strong>Shameless plug:</strong> if you need some mobile web development for your organisation, get in touch. We fellows at the <a href="http://londondevelopercoop.com">London Developer Co-op</a> are doing more and more in this space).</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201106161024</link><dc:subject>mobile, frameworks, mobile+web</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201106161024</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201106161024#comments</comments></item><item><title>The end of the IT department</title><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:19:08 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p><a href="http://www.loudthinking.com">David Heinemeier Hansson</a> has written a provocative post on the 37signals blog about <a href="http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2785-the-end-of-the-it-department">the end of the IT department</a>, with somewhat predictable comments ensuing. I particularly enjoyed <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/02/23/dhh-it-dept">John Gruber&#8217;s pithy analysis</a> of said thread:</p>

<blockquote cite="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/02/23/dhh-it-dept">Certain of the comments on Hansson&#8217;s post remind me of this quote from Upton Sinclair: <q>It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.</q></blockquote> 

<p><span class="smiley smile">:-)</span> Anyway, back to Heinemeier Hansson:</p>

<blockquote cite="http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2785-the-end-of-the-it-department">At the same time, IT job security is often dependent on making things hard, slow, and complex. If the Exchange Server didn&#8217;t require two people to babysit it at all times, that would mean two friends out of work. Of course using hosted Gmail is a bad idea! It&#8217;s the same forces and mechanics that slowly turned unions from a force of progress (proper working conditions for all!) to a force of stagnation (only Jack can move the conference chairs, Joe is the only guy who can fix the microphone).</blockquote>

<p>It&#8217;s a compelling argument: the traditional IT department is frequently derided for being a &#8220;blocker&#8221;, and in my experience that&#8217;s often fair. At the same time, typical corporate IT cost centres are split between a multitude of competing interests, and suffer at the hands of empire-builders, <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html" title="Link to Joel Spolsky, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You&#8221;">architecture astronauts</a>, bungling change and communication policies, pointy-haired bosses, disgruntled end-users and disenfranchised staff. So if we are indeed in the midst of a cycle which heralds the passing of the traditional IT department, is that really such a bad thing for <strong>all</strong> concerned?</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102241319</link><dc:subject>business, cloud computing, workplace, david heinemeier hansson, 37signals</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102241319</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102241319#comments</comments></item><item><title>Pardon our dust</title><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:04:31 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>An unscheduled maintenance window opened up last night (cough), and I took advantage of this to stick the new version of my site up. It&#8217;s barely tested, so if you encounter anything unusual, please bear with me!</p>

<p><em>Update</em>: I&#8217;m re-building server re-directs and DNS is still propagating, so inward-bound links may be a little off-colour today.</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102160904</link><dc:subject>benpoole.com, lotus notes domino</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102160904</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102160904#comments</comments></item><item><title>DDE on Mac &amp; Linux? Nope.</title><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:51:42 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>The whole Designer-on-Mac / Linux thing <a href="http://crashtestchix.com/2011/02/15/chicken-or-the-egg-domino-server-or-mac-dde" title="Link to Marie Scott, &#8220;Chicken or the Egg: Domino Server or Mac DDE?&#8221;">has cropped up again of late</a>, and there&#8217;s been a flurry of activity around the <a href="http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/13F8AD7FC4AF30EF8625739300509ED8?OpenDocument">associated IdeaJam posts</a> too. <a href="http://www.billmal.com/billmal/billmal.nsf/dx/02142011062912PMWMAVJT.htm" title="Link to Bill Malchisky, &#8220;A Passionate Plea for DDE on Mac at Lotusphere 2011&#8221;">Bill Malchisky&#8217;s post</a> has a very eloquent take on it all.</p>

<p>Some of us have been clamouring for Domino Designer back on the Mac since it was pulled in release five. The Mac OS landscape (and mindshare of course) has changed dramatically since the R5 days, and then IBM came along and added fuel to the fire by using Eclipse as the base for new versions of Designer.</p>

<p><q>Fire? How so?</q> I hear you ask&hellip; Well, inadvertently or not, in using Eclipse for your <abbr title="Integrated Development Environment">IDE</abbr> you&#8217;re screaming that your environment will work on more than a Windows box. In the heady days of dreamy possibility represented by Hannover, one of the vaunted plus points for using Eclipse was its expandability, but also the fact that Eclipse is cross-platform.</p>

<p>Sooner or later, if Notes apps are to continue, the aged Windows-based C code underlying the standard Notes client has to be re-written, and then DDE has the wherewithal to become a true cross-platform Eclipse-based IDE of some heft.</p>

<p>But that won&#8217;t happen. Why? XPages. Drop the Notes cruft, go with the <abbr title="Java Server Faces">JSF</abbr>-based XPages platform. If you have that, and only that, for your Domino apps, you stand a fighting chance of getting a cross-platform IDE<sup>*</sup>. Until then, you&#8217;re pissing in the wind.</p>

<p><strong>Let me be clear</strong>: I don&#8217;t mean this as a criticism (which may surprise some readers given my long-standing fondness for Macs). IBM have to pick their battles, and funds have to be apportioned: they&#8217;re not going to spend $$$ making layout regions work in Designer on Ubuntu.</p>

<p><sup>*</sup> that said, I still wouldn&#8217;t hold your breath if I were you. The Rational / Websphere tooling doesn&#8217;t have all this cruft, and that doesn&#8217;t work on OS X either.</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102151651</link><dc:subject>os x, dde, linux, lotus notes domino</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102151651</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102151651#comments</comments></item><item><title>Introducing Couchbase</title><pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:03:43 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>Ooh now this is an interesting development: <a href="http://damienkatz.net/2011/02/couchone_membase_couchbase.html">Damien Katz: CouchOne + Membase = Couchbase</a></p> <blockquote cite="http://damienkatz.net/2011/02/couchone_membase_couchbase.html">Together as Couchbase, we’ll have the fastest, most scalable (both scale up and scale down) NoSQL solution. We will become the standard storage for mobile devices, and the standard server technology for syncing them all together. Our unified solution will dramatically simplify your technology stack and maintenance for building fast responsive apps that scale to millions of users, and also scaling down to phones so people can work and play even when not connected to the network.</blockquote> <p>Now <em>that’s</em> a vision / mission statement / objective / call-it-what-you-will. CouchDb has always offered a replicating, mobile-friendly document-based data store, and Membase is one of those ridiculously scalable, high-availability databases. So combining the two to come up with the best of breed NoSQL solution is most definitely going to garner the new company some attention; I wish Damien and the team the very best of British!</p> <p>(<a href="http://www.couchbase.com">Couchbase</a> also has a great tag-line: <q>Is it us, or did databases just get a lot more awesome?</q>)</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102080903</link><dc:subject>couchdb, membase, couchbase, nosql</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102080903</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201102080903#comments</comments></item><item><title>No redeeming qualities, just bitter invective</title><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:32:43 +0100</pubDate><description><![CDATA<p>Larry Bowden, Vice President of portals and web experience at IBM, has written an article entitled, <cite>How to make your website more enjoyable</cite> which is fascinating, for all the wrong reasons. I don’t know whether I should even link to it (<a href="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/28325.asp">Hah! Of course I do. Here it is</a>). It seems extraordinary to me that IBM have a senior person in charge of the car-crash that comprises their website—especially when said individual then feels compelled to write an article asking readers whether they “delight” their customers with their “exceptional” on-line experiences.</p> <p>Jeepers. Still let’s move on. What insight does Mr. Bowden have for us now that we’re well into the 21st century?</p> <blockquote>I predict that in 2011 most businesses will start running the whole gamut of modern online web marketing activities by utilizing new tools and services made available by a variety of companies worldwide.</blockquote> <p>OK. Well that was a sentence entirely devoid of meaning. Let’s try again:</p> <blockquote><strong>Take personal to a whole new level</strong><br> Welcome the customer and make it personal by offering products and services so specialized that they can’t say “no.” One way to personalize is based on customer attitude, tastes, opinions, preferences, and desires. Use analytics tools&hellip;</blockquote> <p>Ah yes, analytics, IBM’s current “thing”. We call it “reporting” round our way, and we’ve had it since, well, since we’ve had websites. Still, there it is.</p> <p>Mr. Bowden goes on to talk about personalisation, and how that is crucial for a successful business site. Indulge me as I tell a tale that is all too familiar to many IBM Business Partners out there: Big Blue make it personal for me by (a) getting my company name wrong on every page (despite my telling them the correct name in about sixteen different profile screens) and (b) by insisting that I use a defunct email address from my previous employer as my ibm.com log-in. Hmm. OK, I suspect we’ve said all that needs saying&hellip; <strong>Next!</strong></p> <blockquote>If your marketing team is not discussing ways to add more rich media to your website, I recommend it start now. According to the information technology encyclopedia website WhatIsThis.com, rich media is&hellip;</blockquote> <p><strong>Enough. NEXT!</strong></p> <blockquote><strong>Make it go</strong><br> If you can’t check out all the sections of your website with a smartphone or an iPad then forget about gaining and retaining new customers.</blockquote> <p>Wise words. It makes sense to have your site accessible from mobile devices, especially when you consult with partners and customers about “exceptional web experiences.” So let’s take a look at ibm.com, first with the ready.mobi validator:</p> <p><a href="http://ready.mobi/results.jsp?uri=http://www.ibm.com&amp;locale=en_EN"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5016/5390572667_0fd3aecd14.jpg" width="451" height="500" alt="ready.mobi checker results"></a></p> <p>Hmm, not so good. But take it with a pinch of salt: they’re not testing with smartphones in mind, and they have stuff to sell. What about the W3C’s mobile checker?</p> <p><a href="http://validator.w3.org/mobile/check?task=2011012619513651.mobile2&amp;docAddr=http://www.ibm.com/"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5215/5391180546_ed97d113be.jpg" width="486" height="437" alt="W3C Mobile Checker"></a></p> <p>Better.</p> <p>I think I’m done. Thanks for hanging in there, I am off for a lie down in a dark room.</p> <p>(If you want some help with your website, have a chat with your friendly local web developer or IBM Business Partner. They will help you, and on their behalf I promise they won’t use the words “analytics” or “exceptional”).</p>]></description><link>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201101262032</link><dc:subject>ibm.com, web</dc:subject><dc:creator>Ben Poole</dc:creator><guid isPermaLink="true">http://benpoole.com/weblog/201101262032</guid><comments>http://benpoole.com/weblog/201101262032#comments</comments></item>	</channel>
</rss>

